Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
Mais filtros







Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 46(4): 632-639, 2020. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1134196

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective To investigate the effect of perioperative complications involving artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation on rates of explantation and continence as well as health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Materials and methods Inclusion criteria encompassed non-neurogenic, moderate-to-severe stress urinary incontinence (SUI) post radical prostatectomy and primary implantation of an AUS performed by a high-volume surgeon (>100 previous implantations). Reporting complications followed the validated Clavien-Dindo scale and Martin criteria. HRQOL was assessed by the validated IQOL score, continence by the validated ICIQ-SF score. Statistical analysis included Chi (2) test, Mann-Whitney-U test, and multivariate regression models (p <0.05). Results 105 patients from 5 centers met the inclusion criteria. After a median follow-up of 38 months, explantation rates were 27.6% with a continence rate of 48.4%. In the age-adjusted multivariate analysis, perioperative urinary tract infection was confirmed as an independent predictor of postoperative explantation rates [OR 24.28, 95% CI 2.81-209.77, p=0.004). Salvage implantation (OR 0.114, 95% CI 0.02-0.67, p=0.016) and non-prostatectomy related incontinence (OR 0.104, 95% CI 0.02-0.74, p=0.023) were independent predictors for worse continence outcomes. Low visual analogue scale scores (OR 9.999, 95% CI 1,42-70.25, p=0.021) and ICIQ-SF scores, respectively (OR 0.674, 95% CI 0.51-0.88, p=0.004) were independent predictors for increased HRQOL outcomes. Perioperative complications did not significantly impact on continence and HRQOL outcomes. Conclusion Findings show postoperative infections adversely affect device survival after AUS implantation. However, if explantation can be avoided, the comparative long-term functional results and HRQOL outcomes are similar between patients with or without perioperative complications.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/etiologia , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
2.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 44(6): 1215-1223, Nov.-Dec. 2018. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-975663

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Purpose: The objective of the present study is to test the efficiency and practicality of a new artificial sphincter "BR - SL - AS - 904" in the control of urinary incontinence in post - PR patients and to evaluate their complications. Patients and Methods: Fifteen patients with incontinence after one year of radical prostatectomy were included prospectively. All patients underwent artificial urethral sphincter (AUS) implant "BR - SL - AS - 904" according to established technique. Independent variables such as free urinary flow, PAD weight test, ICIQ - SF score and urinary symptoms through the IPSS score were compared in different follow-up moments. Results: Patients submitted to AUS implantation did not present trans - operative or post - operative complications related to the surgical act such as: infection, hematoma, erosion or urinary retention. Device was inert to the body during the follow-up, showing an excellent adaptation of the patients, besides the easy handling. The mean age was 68.20 years 40% of the patients had systemic arterial hypertension, 6.7% diabetes mellitus, 6.7% were hypertensive and diabetic, 13.4% were hypertensive, had diabetes and hypercholesterolemia and 26.7% patients had no comorbidities. It was evidenced that the urinary flow peak during the follow-up remained stable. Decreased averages and median PAD weight test were 135.19 to 75.72 and 106.00 to 23.50, respectively. The IPSS score decreased and the quality of life increased (12.33 to 3.40 and 2.50 to 3.20 respectively). The ICQF - SF questionnaire score also showed a decrease, ranging from 16, 71 to 7.33. Conclusion: The artificial sphincter implant "BR - SL - AS 904" was reproducible, safe and effective in the control of urinary incontinence in post - PR patients.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Incontinência Urinária/cirurgia , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 43(2): 264-270, Mar.-Apr. 2017. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-840822

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Objective To compare outcomes for single urethral cuff downsizing versus tandem cuff placement during artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) revision for urethral atrophy. Materials and Methods We identified 1778 AUS surgeries performed at our institution from 1990-2014. Of these, 406 were first AUS revisions, including 69 revisions for urethral atrophy. Multiple clinical and surgical variables were evaluated for potential association with device outcomes following revision, including surgical revision strategy (downsizing a single urethral cuff versus placing tandem urethral cuffs). Results Of the 69 revision surgeries for urethral atrophy at our institution, 56 (82%) were tandem cuff placements, 12 (18%) were single cuff downsizings and one was relocation of a single cuff. When comparing tandem cuff placements and single cuff downsizings, the cohorts were similar with regard to age (p=0.98), body-mass index (p=0.95), prior pelvic radiation exposure (p=0.73) and length of follow-up (p=0.12). Notably, there was no difference in 3-year overall device survival compared between single cuff and tandem cuff revisions (60% versus 76%, p=0.94). Likewise, no significant difference was identified for tandem cuff placement (ref. single cuff) when evaluating the risk of any tertiary surgery (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.32-4.12, p=0.94) or urethral erosion/device infection following revision (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.20-5.22, p=0.77). Conclusions There was no significant difference in overall device survival in patients undergoing single cuff downsizing or tandem cuff placement during AUS revision for urethral atrophy.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Reoperação/métodos , Uretra/patologia , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Desenho de Prótese , Atrofia , Fatores de Tempo , Uretra/cirurgia , Falha de Prótese , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Seguimentos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estatísticas não Paramétricas
4.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 43(1): 150-154, Jan.-Feb. 2017. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-840794

RESUMO

ABSTRACT This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate a cohort of patients with prostate cancer and persistent urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. From January 2004 to December 2015, eighty-six individuals were identified to have received an AUS implant, provided by a private nonprofit HMO operating in Belo Horizonte, Brazil. On total, there were 91 AUS implants, with a median interval between radical prostatectomy and AUS implant of 3.6 years (IQR 1.9 to 5.5). The rate of AUS cumulative survival, after a median follow-up of 4.1 years (IQR 1.7-7.2 years), was 44% (n=40). The median survival of AUS implants was 2.9 years (IQR 0.5-7.9 years). Thirty-seven AUS implants (40.7%) resulted in grade III surgical complications. There were 5 deaths at 2.1, 4.7, 5.7, 5.7 and 6.5 years of follow-up, but none due to causes directly associated to the AUS implant. Persistent severe incontinence was documented in 14 (15.3%) additional patients. From the 51 AUS implants which resulted in grade III surgical complications or persistent severe incontinence, 24 (47.1%) underwent surgical revisions. Explantation of the sphincter or its components was observed in 6 cases (25.0%). Mechanical failure, described as fluid loss and/or inability to recycle the AUS device, was observed in 4 devices (16.7%). In conclusion, although AUS implants are recommended as the gold-standard treatment of severe urinary incontinence after prostatectomy, the observed high rates of malfunction and grade III adverse events are a matter of concern warranting further assessment on the safety and efficacy of these devices.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Prostatectomia/métodos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Incontinência Urinária/cirurgia , Incontinência Urinária/etiologia , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial/economia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Fatores de Tempo , Falha de Prótese , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Implantação de Prótese/efeitos adversos , Implantação de Prótese/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
5.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 42(3): 494-500, tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-785716

RESUMO

ABSTRACT Purpose to assess the efficacy of transcorporal artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) implantation on continence for male stress urinary incontinence in cases of prior surgical treatment or/and radiation failure, and as a first option in radiation patients. Materials and Methods From March 2007 to August 2012, 37 male patients were treated with transcorporal AUS AMS™ 800. Twelve patients had primary placement of transcorporal cuff, a surgical option due to a previous history of radiation and 25 patients had secondary procedure after failure of AUS or urinary incontinence surgery. Functional urinary outcomes were assessed by daily pad use, 24-hour Pad-test and ICIQ-SF questionnaire. Quality of life and satisfaction were assessed based on I-QoL and PGI-I questionnaires. Results After a median of 32 months, the continence rate (0 to 1 pad) was 69.7%. Median pad test was 17.5g (0-159), mean ICIQ-SF score was 7.3/21 (±5.4) and mean I-QoL score was 93.9/110. A total of 88% of the patients reported satisfaction with the AUS. The 5-year actuarial revision-free for AUS total device was 51%. Patients for primary implant for radiation were not more likely to experience revision than non-radiation patients. Preservation of erections was reported in half of the potent patients. Conclusions Transcorporal AUS cuff placement is a useful alternative procedure option for severe male UI treatment, especially in patients with a compromised urethra after prior surgery or radiation. A high continence rate was reported and implantation as first option in radiation patients should be considered.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Idoso , Uretra/cirurgia , Uretra/efeitos da radiação , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/cirurgia , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Qualidade de Vida , Fatores de Tempo , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/etiologia , Incontinência Urinária por Estresse/radioterapia , Ereção Peniana , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Seguimentos , Resultado do Tratamento , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
6.
Int. braz. j. urol ; 37(4): 483-487, July-Aug. 2011. tab
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-600813

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: We evaluated retrospectively, the long-term outcome of patients with post-prostatectomy urinary incontinence (PPUI) after placement of the Periurethral Constrictor (PUC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-six men with severe PPUI were studied, with a mean age of 68.5 years old. Fifty-one men had PPUI due to radical surgery having the device placed around the bulbous urethra, and five individuals with benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) had placement around the bladder neck. The mean follow-up was 82.2 months. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (39.28 percent) became continent (0 to 1 pad a day) and 34 (60.72 percent) were incontinent. Complications were as follows: urethral erosion in 15 (26.78 percent); mechanical malfunction in 2 (3.5 percent); infection in 2 (3.5 percent); urinary fistula in 1 (1.7 percent); Urinary tract infection1 (1.7 percent). Twenty-three patients needed to have the device removed (41.07 percent). Success rate (continent me) was 30.35 percent. CONCLUSION: In the present series the PUC was not effective for the treatment of severe PPUI in the long-term follow-up.


Assuntos
Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prostatectomia/efeitos adversos , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial , Incontinência Urinária/terapia , Constrição , Remoção de Dispositivo , Seguimentos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Esfíncter Urinário Artificial/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA